Display:
Each time a bank loans a company money, it attaches strings. Those strings are called Covenants in English (and, actually in French too, since the City has overtaken all of our finance words). There are three common covenants: Leverage Ratio, Interest Coverage Ratio, and Fixed Charge Ratio.
Thank you for this, Redstar!  It is not too hard to imagine why I cannot recall seeing anything about this in the US media I have followed nor in any of the coverage of the recent Congressional hearings at which bank CEOs testified.  It seems to be one of those little insider details that surely us lesser mortals would not find interesting.  Is there a source I could cite for the ubiquity of such covenants?  Given what you have set forth, it is certainly clear why having adequate capital reserves is the essence of business survival these days.  

This certainly casts in different light the take over pressure that the financial markets placed on any public company with lots of cash and a healthy cash flow during the preceding several years.  If they don't fall of their own accord they can always be pushed!

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 10:50:37 PM EST
are just obligations to do things and to not do things.

Those that redstar mentions are coverage ratios, which can be used in two ways: when providing the loan, to size the loan (ie, you do a budget of future cash flows, and say that you want no more than 2/3 of that money to be used to reapy the laon (principal and interest), and you calculate how much debt can be carried that way), or during the loan, to trigger defaults.

It's the second kind that redstar correctly describes as covenants, we also call them coverage ratios. I am not keen defaults based on coverage ratios in my deals, because they are fundamentally pro-cyclical and worsen things at precisely the worst moment.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Feb 17th, 2009 at 04:51:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Jérôme is of course 100% correct here, and most covenants contained in a credit agreement are logical things like right of first refusal on further equity issuances, required assent in further debt issuance, annual limitations on capital spending, entering into certain contractual agreements, industry-specific requirements like limitations on plate spend in publishing or on programming spend in television, and so forth. Logical things a bank does to protect the level of risk at which they issued the initial debt.

This being said, when the CEO of the company you work for is, today, talking about covenants, she's talking about the coverage ratios. The rest are, especially now that debt and equity markets have largely shrivelled up and investment is way down, less relevant and, in any case, rarely cause an involuntary default. It's this latter thing corporate masters are most fearing today.

And, as Jérôme says, financial ratio covenants tend to be highly cyclical, and so, in the case of the US and the UK, we see highly cyclical monetary and fiscal policy accentuated by private market behavior.

And not enough stimulus, and the wrong kind.

Things are goign to get ugly over here, that's what my gut is saying.

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Tue Feb 17th, 2009 at 09:56:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
One very sensible covenant that should be part of any government bank bail-out should be a requirement for bank forbearance on previous coverage ratio covenants so as to undercut the pro-cyclical nature of their effects.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Feb 17th, 2009 at 10:35:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series