Being annoyed or offended by something is actually a gift.  It is an indication that there may be a chink in our understanding of the world.

Indeed.

One of my pet ideas, oft repeated here, is the idea of the "Crap Detector" as an essential component of problem solving, and an essential product of real education.
Who said "education should make minds, not tools"?

That crap detector is never more valuable than when it alarms at our own bullshit.
That anger- that urge to attack the person and not the proposition is the alarm.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Sun Feb 22nd, 2009 at 03:25:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... (Αssociation Football, that is) ... a good exercise when reacting to a comment as, "there's XYZ up to his/her old tricks" is to re-read it, pretending its written by a commentator that you admire. You often find that the element that you found most annoying was something that you yourself added as a presumption about what XYZ is on about.

IOW, we cope with the low bandwidth of this medium by building mental models of the people that we encounter the most frequently. That mental model informs our readings when a more and less generous reading of comments may be made. And a mental model that dictates making the less generous reading will be self-reinforcing, since at least sometimes the more generous reading is correct.

The marker for this that is often found fairly early in a flame war is, "No, I didn't mean it that way", "I know you meant it that way because, before, you said this".

Of course, building mental models on the most generous reading will also yield a biased model, but its a happier mistake to be making.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sun Feb 22nd, 2009 at 10:39:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series