(There is a radical difference between mediation and arbitration.  A mediator just explores areas of difference and common ground and tries to guide the disputants to a common position - but ultimate has no say in how the process unwinds - that is up to the disputants.  The mediator doesn't "own" the dispute and can ultimately do no more than make suggestions.  An arbitrator (by prior agreement) hears both sides, and then issues an authoritative ruling - which is then not subject to further negotiation.  I am not suggesting arbitration is appropriate here - and a mediator shouldn't become a "player" in the dispute in question and should keep their personal views on the matter to themselves.)

notes from no w here