Display:
There have been several such incidents.

Two I can think of immediately are when the USS liberty was attacked off Egypt in '67, it was believed by the US fleet off turkey that it had been the russians. Protocol said the response had to be nuclear. The Admiral refused what was, in effect, a direct order.

In the late 80s the moscow missile defence received cnfirmation of a US missile launch. The man in charge could see no reason why the US would do so and believed it was a technical glitch and so held a response until the point when Moscow should have been hit by a missile. It later turned out it was a US radar test. For saving the world, the commander was demoted in disgrace.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sat Feb 28th, 2009 at 02:29:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's another story floating around (maybe the same incident?) of a Russian spy satellite malfunctioning and indicating multiple ICBM launches from a location that - as it happened - was at the time only covered by that one satellite. According to the story, the Russian commander who aborted the retaliatory strike did so with the comment "not even the Americans are stupid enough to start World War Three with only nine missiles."

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Feb 28th, 2009 at 02:33:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series