Display:
  1. The main barrier to the development of an European grid is the lack of a strong and well-financed public initiative on the basis of long-term plans. Neither regional, nor national, nor EU-level policy should be based on expecting advice and solutions from established utilities.

    The EU should act directly on cross-border lines, and get involved in the setting of the goals for national and regional policies (f.e., requiring that grid policies are aimed at ensuring access to the grid for new renewable producers).

  2. The EU should get involved in local disputes when stated EU goals would be adversely affected, e.g. the spread of renewables. If the legal framework was set up (see 1.), the EU should demand action in the spirit of the stated goals of grid policy.

  3. -

  4. The most important activity for the EU in network development is ensuring that utilities give (and can give) access to new renewables producers. (Am I sounding like a broken record?)

  5. My strong personal view is: no, the EU should not get more involved in facilitating infrastructure projects in third countries. The EU should focus all its power on energy independence. Member States and private companies will provide for investments into extra-EU projects that will serve EU energy imports all on their own if they like.


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Feb 3rd, 2009 at 07:09:13 AM EST
  1. If the EU's resources are limited, the best approach would not be support, but some sort of requirement to develop networks (utilities forced to spend from their own resources or some form of tax).

  2. - (will return to it after reading the Green Paper)

  3. Nnno - no extension of the TEN-E to oil infrastructure or others.

  4. -

  5. Sure, turning the TEN-E into an operational security of supply and solidarity instrument would get the EU more visibility, but not necessarily on the positive side.

  6. - (will return to it after reading the Green Paper)


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Feb 3rd, 2009 at 07:18:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
On 2, I'd say:

Local planning disputes can become a matter for EU policy when EU policies that have direct relevance towards planning are affected, e.g. Natura 2000; EIA Directive, or if the planning dispute has a cross-border element and relates to a TEN-E project. Local planning disputes are otherwise an issue for the national government to work out. It has to be made clear that these disputes are not legitimate grounds for failure by national governments to meet EU targets such as a national renewable energy target.

When a local planning dispute threatens to delay a TEN-E project, the EU Commission should put pressure on the national government and try to clarify the project to local communities.

The EU should spend much more effort to prevent local planning disputes by linking up impact assessments to involve local communities at an earlier stage in TEN projects. To that end, more funds should be allocated for IA in DG TREN.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sun Feb 8th, 2009 at 06:48:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
  1. Research and demonstration projects should be targeted specifically towards the operation of a European electricity grid with a high share of renewable energy. This implies directing funds primarily towards storage, local generation and changes to the electricity grid.

  2. The most important activity for the EU is rapid expansion of the TEN-E network through co-funding. Priority should be given to electricity networks. Funding for TEN should be enlarged through an increase in the general budget of the EU, shifting funds within the EU budget away from agriculture and fisheries, and utilising money left over in the budget.

  3. Facilitation of infrastructure investment in third countries should be restricted to cases that bring a direct benefit to the EU energy network. Priority should be given to electricity networks that transport renewable energy, as in the DESERTEC concept, over gas and oil infrastructure.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sun Feb 8th, 2009 at 07:12:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
18 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
2 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
3 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
18 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
2 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series