Display:
Jerome's right nonetheless. I have no specifics about the case, but I'll bet it dates back to long before Obama took office, and justifiably, once it's in the courts, the Obama administration is legally bound to let it play out.

Still though, pressure on America's misdeeds need to be maintained. With blame placed on the guilty. Obama's message team are adults, and when they're worried enough about something like this, they know how to clarify the situation. In my old anthropology class, I learned something that rang so true I haven't forgotten it for almost 40 years: status and prestige in any society (and this is as close as you get to a law of nature in the social sciences) isn't conferred - it's earned, and the holder must periodically reaffirm his fitness for the prestige he holds. Obama must continue with policies that reflect the high-mindedness his campaign trumpeted and which the world continues to expect of him. He must do this just to maintain his legitimacy.

Now that Jerome has spoken, one can justifiably claim that the French regard American security policy in its war on terror with the gravest regard. Hopefully, the French government will begin to reflect the attitudes of it's constituency and transmit this concern/displeasure/alarm to Washington.

Hopefully.

"It Can't Be Just About Us"
--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire

by papicek (papi_cek_at_hotmail_dot_com) on Mon Feb 9th, 2009 at 11:26:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
pursue a particular case:  Once they decide it is not worth continuing, that is the end of it.  

What the ACLU believes and we all suspect is that, whatever he intends for the future of the US Executive, Obama has no interest in correcting past mistakes.

Not what he was hired for, really.    

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Tue Feb 10th, 2009 at 12:33:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well that may be entirely correct, but my point is that when the cabinet officer for a 100,000 employee department that is involved in every sector of law enforcement is confirmed on Feb 4, it is premature to make sweeping conclusions about policy on February 9.
by rootless2 on Tue Feb 10th, 2009 at 12:27:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Anybody with a gram of sense would know to lay down the law on the high-profile cases faster than immediately.

Heads must roll for this rejection. Either there was no new policy, in which case Obama is guilty. Or the policy was communicated with insufficient force, in which case the secretary of Justice is guilty. Or an apparatchik somewhere in the bureaucracy thought that he could continue with business as usual under the new management. In which case he needs to go. Preferably for an extended stay in Alaska or Hawaii.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Feb 12th, 2009 at 12:21:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series