Display:
Also Panarin thinks in a post-collapse U.S., Alaska will revert to Russia. Plus his idea of rump states just doesn't make sense. If the United States collapse, why would states even still exist to form rump states along state lines?

His theory of martial law works well within the Bush administration mindset, but I do not see it with the Obama administration mindset. I think the Panarins of this world would like to see another U.S. civil war. I think we Americans will disappoint him.

His triggers for a U.S. civil war were economic decline, which is happening, mass immigration, which isn't happening because of the economic decline, and moral degradation. Now I don't know specifically what he thinks moral decline is, but I'm guessing it is gays and god related and not state-sanctioned torture and the fraud economy.

All in all, the U.S. is more likely to start another foreign war than a domestic one. The danger for U.S. collapse comes more from the drug war in Mexico spilling over the border than from the economic meltdown.

I think he's a fruitcake.

by Magnifico on Wed Mar 4th, 2009 at 05:18:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the comic strip "Non Sequiter" logic that says start with whatever conclusion you would like to see/propose and then backtrack with any path, valid or no, which will connect that future to now.  He would like to see the US disintegrate so he fishes around for any conditions which might promote that disintegration.

If the US was going to fall apart, the best opportunity would have been for Bush/Cheney/Rummy to let YET ANOTHER terrorist strike hit America LIKE THEY DID KNOWINGLY ON 9-11 (I say again!) and then try to completely shut down all US freedoms.  That would have done it.

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Mar 4th, 2009 at 07:02:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Also Panarin thinks in a post-collapse U.S., Alaska will revert to Russia.


Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 5th, 2009 at 02:10:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
He's a known fruitcake. He's a kind of Russian Limbaugh - he'll make up any old nonsense for attention.

There are rumours - there are always rumours - that he's Putin's pet propaganda creature. So this would be more wishful thinking and suggestion than reality-based reporting.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Mar 5th, 2009 at 08:38:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series