Display:
Good question.  Have you heard of any such prosecutions? Do you have any confidence that lack of such prosecutions is evidence of lack of fraud?

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Mar 24th, 2009 at 11:44:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
not since Nick Leeson and no

 according to the Financial Ombudsman

The essential components of fraud are intent to deceive and desire to induce the firm to pay more than it otherwise would. Establishing these points can require an analysis of the claimant's motives.

Unless you wish to ad,it it's all just a big casino I think it fits.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Wed Mar 25th, 2009 at 08:41:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Is Financial Ombudsman describing UK or USA law or is there a difference on this?  It would seem reasonable to revise the law to make fraud prosecutions less dependent on demonstrating intent, or perhaps create a different legal category in both criminal and civil law not dependent on proving intent.  But then the politicians have another term for those we would call fraudsters: contributors.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Mar 25th, 2009 at 11:13:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's UK law in describing Insurance Fraud, but I would think that the definition and rules would pass fairly openly between the two.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Wed Mar 25th, 2009 at 11:15:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series