Display:
... in Denmark as well, particularly in Aluminium and other export-heavy sectors.

But calls have gone out from Arbejderbevægelsens Erhvervsråd1 saying that this is A Very Bad Idea, because the problem is not with competitiveness, it is with a lack of demand, which is not solved by wage cuts - quite the contrary, they make things worse. (Translation into ET-speak: This is a demand-side crisis, and trying to solve it with supply-side policies is - at best - a beggar-thy-neighbour strategy.)

- Jake

1) AE-rådet are the serious people employed by the labour unions to try to spread a little sanity in public debate.

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Mar 3rd, 2009 at 04:49:19 AM EST
JakeS:
this is A Very Bad Idea, because the problem is not with competitiveness, it is with a lack of demand, which is not solved by wage cuts - quite the contrary, they make things worse
If wage cuts still result in a larger aggregate income for the workers than unemployment subsidies, then the wage cuts are a stop-gap measure.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 3rd, 2009 at 04:51:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Assuming that they are in an A-kasse, and assuming that they are mostly unskilled labour, it will not result in a noticeably larger income than unemployment subsidies.

Skilled labour is another story.

Still, it's nothing that higher unemployment subsidies cannot solve.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Mar 3rd, 2009 at 05:05:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, the idea here is to meet a lack of demand by reducing supply - which naturally means fewer hours worked, and hence lower wages.

Wages per hour will not be reduced by this plan.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Mar 3rd, 2009 at 04:59:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh. I didn't catch that angle. Well, that does make it much less objectionable. Although any wage-reducing deal that does not require the equity holders to go all the way down to a return of [German sovereign debt plus reasonable risk premium] and does not require upper management to take a drastic haircut (to the level of - say - university professor or mid-level public bureaucrat) strikes me as socialising losses from previously privatised gains.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Mar 3rd, 2009 at 05:03:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series