Display:
I had read about half of 'Globalisation and its discontents' when I either loaned it or misplaced it, so I haven't finished it.  Nor can I re-check what I previously read.  Does Mankiw argue for any particular value for the root?  Some small amount above unity?

This all seems sort of like what we would have expected if Ptolemy had been capable of Fourier analysis when he was accounting for retrograde motions of planets with epicycles.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Mar 5th, 2009 at 12:57:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have read only Krugman's response. Not the original statement.

There is written in the end:

But to invoke the unit root thing to disparage growth forecasts now involves more than a bit of deliberate obtuseness. How can you fail to acknowledge that there's huge slack capacity in the economy right now? And yes, we can expect fast growth if and when that capacity comes back into use.

And what I say is, that this capacity isn't there or at least not fully, because it is not capacity in producing the things, that are demanded in the future.

Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den Menschen
Volker Pispers

by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Thu Mar 5th, 2009 at 01:34:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Mar 5th, 2009 at 02:11:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series