Display:
The easiest way to add complexity to the Fitness Landscape is to build some - say 10 to 20 - analog computers, cross-linkable with A/D and D/A conversion to/from the neural net to simulate continuous data streams which the neural net nodes have to 'chunk' - both for data processing and across time.

Analog computers with >90dB dynamic range working with 16 bit A/Ds and D/As could give really fine levels of resolution and speed.  And your point about non-Van Neumann modeling systems is important.  The ability of human controllers to make inputs to either the analog or digital models based on intuition or just trying to crash the system would also be valuable. This might be interesting enough for someone to write a grant for funding the initial phases.  What about Bob? :-)

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat Apr 25th, 2009 at 11:57:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The neat thing, for us, about analog computers is they are "noisy."  Even the A/D and D/A conversions interject noise.  Great!  We're dealing with a thundering horde of lousy data and there's little point in pretending any different.
by ATinNM on Sun Apr 26th, 2009 at 12:10:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I know someone doing research into analog computers. They're much, much faster than anything that would be needed here. And - using his approach - very cheap too.
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2009 at 06:58:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
For a long time I've toyed with the idea of buiding an analog computer...

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2009 at 08:03:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series