Display:
Actually it's a perfectly effective construct for keeping the rentier class in power with the support of an expensive warrior class.

The irrationality comes from the fact that it's suicidally self-defeating in the medium to long term.

It's lemming politics, and no cleverer than that. The rentiers believe they're masters of the universe, but in reality they're just stupid animals.

Any rational reinvention has to include at least some evidence of strategy and rational planning rooted in higher brain function.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun May 10th, 2009 at 09:24:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Classical Economics was effectively founded by Adam Smith, who did essentially develop a complete moral and political-economic theory in Wealth  of Nations and Theory of the Moral Sentiments.  Unfortunately, the profession of economics has been notably disinclined to even consider the significant advances we have made in the human sciences since Smith's time.

Economics, of necessity, deals with wealth, money and banks.  Economists, of necessity, learn that they must respect the prejudices and the interests of the wealthy if they are to find wide employment for their educational qualifications in existing societies.  And in our debased society, respect and acclaim follows wealth and worldly success.  Combined, these factors are powerful forces for stasis in economic thought.  The effectiveness and explanatory power of an economic system only comes to be relevant so long as it also favors stasis of existing wealth distribution.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun May 10th, 2009 at 11:01:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
ARGeezer:
Economics, of necessity, deals with wealth, money and banks.  Economists, of necessity, learn that they must respect the prejudices and the interests of the wealthy if they are to find wide employment for their educational qualifications in existing societies.  And in our debased society, respect and acclaim follows wealth and worldly success.  Combined, these factors are powerful forces for stasis in economic thought.  The effectiveness and explanatory power of an economic system only comes to be relevant so long as it also favors stasis of existing wealth distribution.

But since banks are not in fact necessary for money generation (other than money as debt), and wealth need not in fact be a claim over wealth issued by a bank, then a new Economics may perhaps be developed to explain an emergent post-Finance Capital economics.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Mon May 11th, 2009 at 03:45:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Possibly. But then that new Economics must provide jobs (p2p credit consultants?) and funding for academics (lobby your politicians).

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by A swedish kind of death on Mon May 11th, 2009 at 05:30:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
ARGeezer:
Unfortunately, the profession of economics has been notably disinclined to even consider the significant advances we have made in the human sciences since Smith's time.
They have also been notably disinclined to read what Smith wrote.

We would do well to pick up where JS Mill left off around 1870...

The brainless should not be in banking. — Willem Buitler

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon May 11th, 2009 at 04:37:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
ThatBritGuy:
Actually it's a perfectly effective construct for keeping the rentier class in power with the support of an expensive warrior class.

Well, as the guy said, you can resist an invading army, but you can't resist an idea.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Mon May 11th, 2009 at 03:46:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series