Display:

Derrière les tarifs il y a, en fait, l'avantage compétitif que la rente nucléaire procure à EDF et qui fausse les règles du jeu de la concurrence. En France, près de 80 % de l'électricité sort des réacteurs d'EDF, l'une des moins chères d'Europe. Si les prix sur le marché libre reflètent plutôt les prix européens, calés sur le kilowatt-heure produit par la dernière centrale construite (souvent un cycle combiné gaz), les prix régulés payés par la majorité des foyers sont assez bas grâce aux centrales nucléaires construites entre le milieu des années 1970 et la fin des années 1990. Au seul bénéfice d'EDF.

Behind teh regulated tariffs , one finds, in fact, the competitive advantage provided to EDF by nuclear, and which distorts competition. In France, 80% of electricity is produced by EDF, one of the cheapest producers in Europe. If free market price are closer to European prices set on the price of the most recently built plant (usually a combined cylce gas plant), regulated prices paid by most households are pretty low thanks to the nuclear plants built in the 70s to the 90s. For EDF's sole benefit

The number of errors or omissions in one paragraph is quite stunning:

  • a low-cost producer distorts competition. That's an interesting notion, to say the least;
  • so what's bad about owning cheap nuclear? Is it that it's not rally cheap? (apparently not) Is it the technology (doesn't seem so)? Is it that is was built by a State-owned company? Is it that private sector competitors can't make money in France and are complaining loudly?
  • the market price is not that of the most recently built plant, but of the one with the highest marginal cost needed to respond to demand; again, the stunning ignorance of economics by economic journalists. Why am I still surprised?
  • that French consumers have cheap electricity is to "EDF's sole benefit." Aren't the consumers happy too? Or is it that only profits matter, and those do not go to EDF's competitors?
  • EDF is 87% State-owned. So what goes to EDF goes to French taxpayers (which also paid for said nuclear plants 20 years ago). Why is that bad?


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2009 at 06:38:46 PM EST
But it's so much easier to blame European civil servants' innate, structural neoliberalism.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2009 at 06:39:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
but of the one with the highest marginal cost needed to respond to demand

Aha - much clearer than in the main text.

by det on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 04:29:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Acutally, since EDF exports lots, 80 % of electricity produced in France comes from nuclear power, but only 65% of electricity consumed in France comes from nuclear power.

/nitpicking.

Rien n'est gratuit en ce bas monde. Tout s'expie, le bien comme le mal, se paie tot ou tard. Le bien c'est beaucoup plus cher, forcement. Celine

by UnEstranAvecVueSurMer (holopherne ahem gmail) on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 08:05:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yep; I might add that would it not export, the domestic figure would be about the same...

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 10:02:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It hadn't crossed my mind to make the counter factual. Thanks.

Rien n'est gratuit en ce bas monde. Tout s'expie, le bien comme le mal, se paie tot ou tard. Le bien c'est beaucoup plus cher, forcement. Celine
by UnEstranAvecVueSurMer (holopherne ahem gmail) on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 11:48:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
When I'm a high-priced producer I hate the distortion of the market by low-priced producers.  Well, it does tend to make things difficult.

NYT says we've lost 5 million jobs here since the "recession" started.

"I said, 'Wait a minute, Chester, You know I'm a peaceful man...'" Robbie Robertson

by NearlyNormal on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 01:54:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
a low-cost producer distorts competition. That's an interesting notion, to say the least;

It is perfectly understandable if you understand "competition" as a PR activity designed to mask optimal exploitation of a finite market by a small group of "competetors" who do not wish to have their profits limited by the marginal cost of the highest cost producer.  Why not instead empirically determine just how high prices can go before attracting negative attention from legal authorities?

This appeared to be the case in Southern California in the '90s.  One major company raised its prices for gasoline and waited.  If the other majors didn't follow suit they could rescind the increase.  But the others followed suit.  No one had the capacity to replace the supply of another major so why compete at the margin if you could get more.

The increases were noteworthy for not being accounted for by increases in the prices of crude or the availability of refined product for the local market.  An uncouth business writer for the LA Times wrote an article on the phenomenon.  The large vendors learned to be more subtle.  Articles appeared with greater frequency explaining the peculiarities of the California gasoline market, refineries came to be more prone to outages during the peak season, etc.  

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Apr 30th, 2009 at 01:32:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
pricing is at the highest level that can be borne by a given level of demand, when demand is not very elastic.

It's just not usually explained like this: people tend to find average cost of production more "logical" a pricing mechanism, which means that market pricing is actually rather counter-intuitive.

But it's never explained properly.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Apr 30th, 2009 at 02:58:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But it's never explained properly.

Wouldn't want to rile up the masses.  Better to confound them with marginal pricing theology, lest they turn to seeking mechanisms that could reduce "the highest level that can be borne by a given level of demand."  Better also run some more articles about the bounty currently provided for all by the wonders of the market to distract support from those who would point out that the small number of players and the nature of the supply and the demand mean that this situation doesn't really satisfy normal definitions of a market.  Point out that (some) alternatives could be worse, but don't mention that some might be better.  Alternatives are comples and scary.  

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Apr 30th, 2009 at 03:29:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Uh...complex and scary.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Apr 30th, 2009 at 03:30:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
24 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
4 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
24 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series