Display:
Jake's comment above was that people with savings of over 100K should take a haircut... in other words not receive a guarantee for their assets coz' they're too wealthy.
by vladimir on Tue May 19th, 2009 at 03:20:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
well, I agree. They put money (ie lent money) to a company (the bank) that went bankrupt. Why should they be guaranteed??

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 19th, 2009 at 03:21:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So where do you want them to put their money? Under their mattress? If they put their money into junk bonds (or other risky assets) then your argument is fine. But we're talking about a simple deposit account here. If that's not guaranteed, you might as well hoard gold in your house's safe. Talk about progress.
by vladimir on Wed May 20th, 2009 at 02:31:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
German sovereign debt.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed May 20th, 2009 at 03:24:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
vladimir:
But we're talking about a simple deposit account here.

Does anyone keep more than £100k in a simple deposit account?

The higher the guaranteed deposit limit, the more the government has a responsibility to manage and regulate the banking sector.

You can't have a free-wheeling market without oversight and expect government support to be unlimited.

Well - apparently in fact you can. But you shouldn't be able to.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu May 21st, 2009 at 06:02:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series