Display:

In Denmark, we have one system, Dankort, which then interfaces with all these funny credit card companies. But the backbone is a single system. There is no reason - other than tradition - that this backbone couldn't be run by the state.

I'd add that it's the same in France, with the Groupement Carte Bleue (which was imposed on reluctant banks by the government) imposing a single set of rules for cards clearing and ATMs.


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed May 20th, 2009 at 05:23:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In France the old clearing & settlement system was the SIT - not Groupement CB, which clears through the SIT. The SEPA compliant system currently being implemented in France (and taking over from the SIT) is the STET.
by vladimir on Wed May 20th, 2009 at 05:33:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks. You obviously know that activity better than me, but the point remains that the government forced banks to work with one system rather than having separate "competitive" systems - and as a result France had carte à puces many years before the "competitive" markets.

Same with GSM - thanks to heavy-handed regulation at the highest level (in this case Europe), Europe got a better standard, and imposed it across the world. With 3G, industry tried again to impose incompatible standards onto weaker regulators, and the result was incompatible standards and Europe losing its leadership.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu May 21st, 2009 at 08:02:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series