Display:
When I read your diary and listened to your interview of Dick Roche I was struck with how reasonable he seemed on many issues and how he was willing to comment rather starkly on many subjects.  I suppose that is the upside of being a minister in the dominant party that is kept in power by the conviction of the pious that this party will keep safe their beloved Church come what may.  This large portion of the electorate might not like what they are hearing about the Church, but probably fear that a less staunchly supportive party would allow things "to go too far."  In such a context having a scandal such as the one now underway could actually prove a benefit to his party.  Does that make sense in an Irish context?  

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Fri May 22nd, 2009 at 06:29:07 PM EST
I'm not sure about this theory.  I'm sure most conservative Catholics despair both for their Church and for the Irish political system at the moment, because no one is prepared to take their side at the moment.

The main challenge to Fianna Fail is coming from the left at the moment, because of their complicity in the deal they did with the Catholic Church to cap the latter's liability to c. 10% of the cost of compensation to victims.

Criticising Krugman, Klaus and Ganley, even in strong terms, plays well with a nationalist gsllery because all can be painted as interfering in Ireland's affairs. (Ganley at a subliminal level, because he speaks with an English accent).

Sticking up for Ireland's independence from nefarious outside influences never did a politician any hay harm!

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sat May 23rd, 2009 at 07:41:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series