As far as I'm aware, compounding debt and private land ownership are common to all "developed" economies.

Big differences. The Anglo Disease countries are - by definition of "Anglo Disease", I submit - more focused than non-Anglo Disease countries on the privatisation of everything that doesn't move, and much that does. Land is only part, but the biggest part, of the problem, in that it is through claims over land that over two thirds of Anglo money/credit is backed.

The proportion of public ownership of land/property and a tradition of land/property rentals is much greater in the non-Anglo countries, particularly (say) Germany.

In that money is involved in both Diseases then yes, there is a loose connection.

The Dutch disease is about the misinvestment of the fruits of (wasting) productive assets. The Anglo Disease is about the creation of claims over productive assets and the inequitable allocation of these claims.

afew:

Isn't there a case, though, for saying that the UK has exported natgas and financial services without adequate investment in a diversified domestic economy?

Yes, the UK has pissed away a carbon windfall on unemployment benefit.

The UK has also failed to adequately tax the windfall from the intellectual and human capital represented by the City, and to adequately invest the tax they did raise.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky