Display:
Sweden has different registries for local and european elections.

In local elections anyone who is has Swedish citizenship or EU citizenship and is living in Sweden or has lived in Sweden for more then 3 years can vote, and the voting list is created from the population registry that also keeps track of where you pay your local taxes and such.

In the EP elections it appears (I am basing this on accounts from various EU citizens in Sweden) that a form was sent to EU citizens in Sweden that was in the population registry. It also appears that the default option was "want to vote in Sweden" which kicked in even if you did not answer. Furthermore it appears that the nordic countries collaborated by checking that no-one was on two lists, probably an extension of a long-standing cooperation on population registries.

In conclusion, two registries, but not much hassle.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 10:05:20 AM EST
Thanks, askod.

One thing that now becomes clear: EU countries may be divided (re electoral rolls) into "automatic" and "declarative" categories. One group (that includes Sweden) derives its electoral lists automatically from other sources (taxation rolls, or residency rolls), the other, from individual inscription by voters (example, France).

Those who reside in an "automatic" country are much more likely to receive useful information (as with the forms sent out in Sweden), than those in "declarative" countries (in France, my impression is that if you don't go to the town hall and pester them, you won't be told anything).

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 10:21:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I must note here that I first heard about "voter registration" (what you call "declarative") during the campaign for the 1996 or 2000 US elections -- and I was appalled, and thought this is another element of the inferior and unfair US system. I learnt only later that some European countries have this system, too.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 10:32:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A 2006 study by the French Senate lists Germany, the UK, Italy, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Belgium as generating electoral rolls automatically from other sources. (They don't seem to have included Sweden.)
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 11:13:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, they examine all of those countries, but find differences. First registration and revision (e.g. when moving) is not automatic in Portugal and the UK. However, in Portugal, registration is obligatory.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 12:42:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In Belgium too, because there is an obligatory list of residents, and it's obligatory to vote.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 02:45:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Voter registration in the US, of course, includes an option on which party you register as a voter for.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 11:16:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thats always struck me as somewhat bizzare, almost denying the invisibility of choice in the vote.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 11:21:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There is "Independent".

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 12:42:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
it would still seem to me, a way of supressing minirity viewpoints.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 01:09:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yep. It also enables a wider sense of party allegiance to apply in primaries (well, where primaries are still constrained even so). Which I don't think is a good thing -- the candidates of a party should be selected by those who involve themselves with politics deep enough, and show colours by becoming card-carrying members; otherwise, any programme can be watered up indefinitely and other parties may influence results on purpose, IMO.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 at 01:58:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
OTOH, there are those who would argue that lacking primaries makes politics less accessible to the citizens at large. Ultimately, though, I think primaries give a largely false sense of participation - the party machinery can manage the outcome to a very large extent.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sun Jun 21st, 2009 at 05:04:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series