Display:
I can't speak for other schools, but we haven't abandoned that 10-20%.  If anything, it's the top 10% that I tend to feel guilty about, because the don't cares drain so much time and resources from the rest of the class. The bright kids I have to support in non time-intensive ways, by lending them books on their individual enthusiasms, for instance, and making myself available to talk/supervise internet use at breaktimes if there's something they want to know more about.

Unfortunately, the ones who don't give a damn at 14 didn't give a damn at seven, either. I reckon, even if I can't prove, that we can almost always tell when a child is supported at home. You do get children who are keen to learn despite parents who don't much care, but not many of them. And wits' end just about covers it some days. I'm far enough down the food chain that Sats results don't worry me much as a statistic.  But in terms of individual achievement, they're terrifying. I was told in my initial training that 85% of children who get level 4 (the government target) at age 11 will get "five good GCSEs".  85% of children who don't, won't. That's one hell of a motivation to get the best out of every child you can.

by Sassafras on Tue Jun 16th, 2009 at 05:32:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My experience is that the biggest gift a child can have is a parent or parents who cares and is involved with the child's education.  Absent that, there are the "survivor types" who are self starters and overcome all obstacles.  I don't know what the frequency of such individuals is, but I suspect that it is a very poor base on which to build a society.  Natural fecundity alone is an inadequate base for society.  Would that the major religions would "get" that basic fact.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Jun 16th, 2009 at 10:31:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series