Display:
Isn't this about whether the law protects your anonymity after it's already been compromised?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jun 17th, 2009 at 05:57:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, it's about - or should have been about - whether there's a reasonable expectation that opinions and experiences should always be traced to an identifiable author.

There's a series of anonymously-written books in the UK about a woman who works as a call girl. If that person was named, it would very likely damage the earning potential of those books.

Why should a journalist have the right to destroy someone's livelihood for the sake of a story?

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jun 17th, 2009 at 06:22:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series