The 400-foot design was discovered in a barley field in Yatesbury near Devizes and depicts the mythical phoenix reborn as it rises from the ashes. Investigators claim more formations are referencing the possibility of a cataclysmic event occurring on December 21, 2012, which coincides with the end of the ancient Mayan calendar.
Investigators claim more formations are referencing the possibility of a cataclysmic event occurring on December 21, 2012, which coincides with the end of the ancient Mayan calendar.
The Mayans believed civilisation exists within a series of earth cycles of 144,000 days each with the 13th expiring in December 2012, resulting in Armageddon.
In general, almost 90% of all the incoming cosmic rays are protons, about 9% are helium nuclei (alpha particles) and about 1% are electrons. The ratio of hydrogen to helium (28% by mass He) is about the same as the primordial elemental abundance ratio of these elements (24% by mass He) in the universe.
The proton is a subatomic particle with an electric charge of +1 elementary charge. It is found in the nucleus of each atom but is also stable by itself and has a second identity as the hydrogen ion, 1H+. It is composed of 3 even more fundamental particles comprising two up quarks and one down quark.
usual source... You can't be me, I'm taken
The first observation of a cosmic ray with an energy exceeding 1020 electronvolts was made by John Linsley at the Volcanic Ranch experiment in New Mexico in 1962.[1][2] Cosmic rays with even higher energies have since been observed. Among them was the Oh-My-God particle (a play on the nickname "God particle" for the Higgs boson) observed on the evening of 15 October 1991 over Dugway Proving Grounds, Utah. Its observation was a shock to astrophysicists, who estimated its energy to be approximately 3 × 1020 electronvolts (50 joules)-- in other words, a subatomic particle with macroscopic kinetic energy equal to that of a baseball (142 g or 5 ounces) at 96 km/h (60 mph). It was most probably a proton with a velocity only very slightly below the speed of light. To a static observer, such a proton, traveling at [1 − (5×10−24)] times c, would travel only 47 nanometers (5×10−24 light-years) less than a light-year in one year.[3] (the proton would only be 47 nm behind a photon traveling the same path from the same point over the past year).
The first observation of a cosmic ray with an energy exceeding 1020 electronvolts was made by John Linsley at the Volcanic Ranch experiment in New Mexico in 1962.[1][2]
Cosmic rays with even higher energies have since been observed. Among them was the Oh-My-God particle (a play on the nickname "God particle" for the Higgs boson) observed on the evening of 15 October 1991 over Dugway Proving Grounds, Utah. Its observation was a shock to astrophysicists, who estimated its energy to be approximately 3 × 1020 electronvolts (50 joules)-- in other words, a subatomic particle with macroscopic kinetic energy equal to that of a baseball (142 g or 5 ounces) at 96 km/h (60 mph).
It was most probably a proton with a velocity only very slightly below the speed of light. To a static observer, such a proton, traveling at [1 − (5×10−24)] times c, would travel only 47 nanometers (5×10−24 light-years) less than a light-year in one year.[3] (the proton would only be 47 nm behind a photon traveling the same path from the same point over the past year).
Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin limit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This limit was computed in 1966 by Kenneth Greisen[1] and Vadim Kuzmin and Georgiy Zatsepin[2] independently; based on interactions predicted between the cosmic ray and the photons of the cosmic microwave background radiation. They predicted that cosmic rays with energies over the threshold energy of 5×1019 eV would interact with cosmic microwave background photons to produce pions. This would continue until their energy fell below the pion production threshold. ... Because of the mean path associated with the interaction, extragalactic cosmic rays with distances more than 50 Mpc (163 Mly) from the Earth with energies greater than this threshold energy should never be observed on Earth, and there are no known sources within this distance that could produce them. A number of observations have been made by the AGASA experiment that appeared to show cosmic rays from distant sources with energies above this limit (called ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, or UHECRs). The observed existence of these particles was the so-called GZK paradox or cosmic ray paradox.
...
Because of the mean path associated with the interaction, extragalactic cosmic rays with distances more than 50 Mpc (163 Mly) from the Earth with energies greater than this threshold energy should never be observed on Earth, and there are no known sources within this distance that could produce them.
A number of observations have been made by the AGASA experiment that appeared to show cosmic rays from distant sources with energies above this limit (called ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, or UHECRs). The observed existence of these particles was the so-called GZK paradox or cosmic ray paradox.
A number of exotic theories have been advanced to explain the AGASA observations. The most notable is the theory of doubly-special relativity. However, it is now established that standard doubly special relativity does not predict any suppression of the GZK cutoff, contrary to the pattern explored since 1997 by Luis Gonzalez-Mestres where an absolute local rest frame (the "vacuum rest frame") exists.[citation needed] Other possible theories involve a relation with dark matter.
The most notable is the theory of doubly-special relativity. However, it is now established that standard doubly special relativity does not predict any suppression of the GZK cutoff, contrary to the pattern explored since 1997 by Luis Gonzalez-Mestres where an absolute local rest frame (the "vacuum rest frame") exists.[citation needed]
Other possible theories involve a relation with dark matter.
Apparently not...
In July 2007, during the 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference in Mérida, Yucatán, México, the High Resolution Fly's Eye Experiment (HiRes) and the Auger International Collaboration presented their results on ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. HiRes has observed a suppression in the UHECR spectrum at just the right energy, observing only 13 events with an energy above the threshold, while expecting 43 with no suppression. This result has been published in the Physical Review Letters in 2008 and as such is the first observation of the GZK Suppression.[3] The Auger Observatory has confirmed this result: instead of the 30 events necessary to confirm the AGASA results, Auger saw only two, which are believed to be heavy nuclei events. According to Alan Watson, spokesperson for the Auger Collaboration, AGASA results have been shown to be incorrect.
According to the analysis made by the AUGER collaboration the existence of the GZK cutoff seems to be confirmed, but it has been pointed out that the consequences of this result for models of Lorentz symmetry violation may depend crucially on the composition of the UHECR spectrum,[7] and that a delayed suppression of the GZK cutoff cannot yet be excluded.
Amazing, isn't it?
More seriously - LHC => a bit less than 10^15eV, more or less.
The most energetic, but very rare, cosmic rays => 10^21eV.
How dangerous can a single particle be? You'll get the usual spray of products, but I'm not sure how much damage they'd do on their way through.
More seriously,
Sievert - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In terms of SI base units: 1 Sv = 1 Jkg = 1 m2s2 = 1 m2·s-2 ... For acute full body equivalent dose, 1 Sv causes nausea, 2-5 Sv causes epilation or hair loss, hemorrhage and will cause death in many cases. More than 3 Sv will lead to LD 50/30 or death in 50% of cases within 30 days, and over 6 Sv survival is unlikely. (For more details, see radiation poisoning.)
In terms of SI base units:
For acute full body equivalent dose, 1 Sv causes nausea, 2-5 Sv causes epilation or hair loss, hemorrhage and will cause death in many cases. More than 3 Sv will lead to LD 50/30 or death in 50% of cases within 30 days, and over 6 Sv survival is unlikely. (For more details, see radiation poisoning.)
If you had one particle the result would be more random.
But since you'd have to be naked and in space, it's probably not easy to test empirically.
I think this has some connection to cosmic particles passing through atomic lattices - but I am not sure ;-) You can't be me, I'm taken
I think this has some connection to cosmic particles passing through atomic lattices - but I am not sure ;-)
Cosmic ray - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When cosmic ray particles enter the Earth's atmosphere they collide with molecules, mainly oxygen and nitrogen, to produce a cascade of lighter particles, a so-called air shower. The general idea is shown in the figure which shows a cosmic ray shower produced by a high energy proton of cosmic ray origin striking an atmospheric molecule.
You do realize that lead shielding is pervious to Cosmic Rays?
I think the Olympics are happening around then too.
So - er - just thought you ought to know.
Or not know. I forget now.
Someone just told me that no one knows how microprocessors work because there's an equation inside them (sic) in which x+infinity is divided by y+infinity, and this isn't mathematically possible.
Where do these people come from & why don't they go back there?
...the Mayans migrated North, and then it's something about Lunar calendars and Omaha indians
Oh why not.
And I'm sure they had lead acid battery powered astronomical computer as well.
And pyramids.
And an advanced non-industrial civilization taught to them by the Space Beings.
(It's all covered-up by the government, you know.)
In that case we will only have to wait some 1 500 million years for six more galactic spins. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
(Although, the predicted solar maximum for 2012 might do a number on our communications, and that would certainly leave its mark globally.)
Sheesh. People need to relax.
"People need to relax if that's what the whole thing's about."
Having satellites knocked out by solar storms wouldn't be fun (and I refuse to watch Knowing-- no solar flares for me, thank you). But now I wonder if the galactic things we're supposed to see are really just intense auroras!
Only he got it completely wrong, and the Mayan cycle really ended a few years ago.
I'll admit I'm fascinated by this constant need to try to prefigure apocalypse. If it's not the imminent end of the world, it's the antichrist. Or maybe some variation of ascension into paradise by way of the return of Jesus, the Rapture, the arrival of the space people, or a technological singularity.
Also available on video.
Astonishingly, the date of Mother Shipton's predicted end of the world appears to have been shifted to 2012.
Still, it all came in useful when some blithering child of sick fundamentalist parents started scaring my daughter by telling her she wasn't going to live to get to high school because God Was Coming.
My own experience and ten minutes on the internet proving how many people had made themselves look really stupid with these predictions soon cheered her up.
And if she had any residual worries, I should think three years of high school has pretty much wiped them out.
There is actually a whole other 2012 contingent that doesn't think it wil be the end of the world, just an ending or change in how we view something. I think they mean other than 2012 prophecies. ;-) Kind of like how the Internet/Web changed communication and commerce, only on more of a psychological/spiritual scale.
The beginning of the last Baktun saw, possibly, the emergence of modern humans. The oldest dated remains found at Crô Magnon are around 35.000 years old. You can't be me, I'm taken
Or a culture looking for patterns over any many generations. I don't think we, today, have any idea what it feels like to be part of an ongoing effort to find patterns in the celestial or terrrestrial - over hundreds, if not thousands of years.
The only thing that was important to the Mayans (for example), imo, was that there HAD to be a Tellurian pattern. It was beyond preservation. You can't be me, I'm taken
