Display:
7 years "longer" and 7 years "later" are not the same thing. People studying longer or having difficulty finding full time jobs also means that they need to be supported by society in that period, and that burden seems to be nearable, so why would more years as pensioners would not be?

As to the fact that people are now simply enjoying life as young adults without the social obligation (especially for women) to get married and have babies does not mean that such a trend will continue linearly forever - there are physiological limits to that. Marriage is increasingly unrelated to whether one lives in a couple or has a family...

And as to housing, extrapolating the past 30 years, which were essentially one bubble followed by one larger bubble, into the next 30 is rather ... daring.

But whatever, this is just about trying to grab people's money for insurance funds.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Jun 18th, 2009 at 04:50:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Jerome a Paris:
this is just about trying to grab people's money for insurance funds
Ain't that the truth...

marco:

Aviva is therefore warning that people need to start planning for their retirement sooner rather than later. <...>

Darren Dicks, head of annuity propositions for Aviva UK Life, said: "There is a risk that without forward planning, today's young adults could end up in a work-to-live cycle for what feels like `forever'.

Aviva is wrong, though. Today's young adults will take a longer time to join the workforce and will drop out of it and into long-term unemployment at the age of 45, having to wait 30 years until they qualify for a measly 'charity' pension when they're 75.

Raising a family, you say? On a lifetime earned wage of 15 years?

The brainless should not be in banking. — Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 18th, 2009 at 05:23:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series