Display:
Gordon Brown: I could walk away from this tomorrow | Politics | The Guardian

Gordon Brown has admitted that he has been "hurt" by the personal attacks on him during the failed attempt to oust him this month, and said that he might move to teaching after he leaves office.

Speaking to the Guardian in his first interview since the attempted coup by Labour backbenchers, the prime minister made an unprecedentedly frank series of observations on his time in office, reflecting that the recent weeks have been the worst of his political life.

"To be honest, you could walk away from all of this tomorrow," he said. "I'm not interested in what accompanies being in power. I wouldn't worry if I never returned to all those places - Downing Street, Chequers ... And it would probably be good for my children."

In an apparent acknowledgement of criticism of a lack of vision at the heart of government, the prime minister said he had found it hard to focus on strategic planning "as you have to deal with immediate events, like if a bank's going to go under".



Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Sat Jun 20th, 2009 at 01:52:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The tragedy of Brown is that he doesn't understand that his job is all about the big things and to employ other people to deal with the fine detail that he finds to distracting.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Jun 21st, 2009 at 05:28:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But an ability to argue about, and understand, the fine detail within government is v. important. Clinton was ready (even eager) to discuss with his advisers the fine detail of many aspects of the govt machine - but knew that, as a public President, his job was always explaining the big picture.

 What Brown and many like him do not get, is that being a number-spewing leader is not impressive to most of the electorate.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Jun 21st, 2009 at 05:40:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As always I'd argue there's a large ground between no involvement and Brown's nit-picking that many would consider reasonable.

Nothing I've read about Brown suggests that what he does is reasonable. He doesn't just engage with heads of department about what he wants done, he will engage in correspondence at fairly junior levels. Which is absurd.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Jun 21st, 2009 at 06:02:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series