Display:
It would seem prudent to be concerned about both inflation and deflation, but is important to keep in mind what is the most pressing current problem without forgetting and leaving ourselves helpless in the face of the following problem.  I would be much happier were the USA spending $Trillions more on alternative energy investments and several times that investment less on guarantees to the banking sector.

What is needed is concerted effort to sever the hands of dying financial institutions that are currently around the neck of the entire US society before that sector drags us all into an early grave.  It is NOT a question of spending or guarantees per se, but rather a question of the long term effectiveness of that spending and those guarantees and the constraints they place on future policy.  See the second link in my comment down thread.  It is to a paper by Simon Johnson showing the consequences of such decisions.  See also the post based on Edward Harrison below.  We can say "Fuck inflation", but we had better be prepared to be well and truly fucked by inflation if we are unprepared when recovery is underway.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Jun 3rd, 2009 at 01:18:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
For sure. Inflation isn't the problem, and since the 70s - when it was linked to oil prices anyway - it never really has been.

The problem is wealth concentration. What the US has now is a ghost economy, populated entirely by chimeras, supported by a huge pile of government-backed 'Would I lie to you?'

But there's no foundation. So the real economy will remain in depression while the ghost economy resumes modest growth - for a while, until the 'Would I lie to you?' runs out.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Fri Jun 5th, 2009 at 07:23:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series