Re 9: in this point, I focused on benefits other than operational. The Einheitsloks (both the steamers of the thirties and the electrics of the fifties-sixties) had a geat many interchangeable parts. In the locomotive shop, even main parts could be cycled between locomotives of different classes in revision at the same time. There have even been conversions between the 110 (originally express), 139 (mountain freight) and 140 (freight) classes. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Re#9 the Br 110s were converted to BR 139s by taking bogies from retired Br 140s, which probably required modifications to the traction motor cooling ducts as the Br 140 uses a bogie with a longer wheelbase.
The death knell of the Universal locomotive was sounded by the increasing differences in the type of services they are needed for. Passenger locomotives are required to achieve higher speeds, supply electrical power to passenger cars, and operate in push-pull mode. While freight locomotives need signalling systems for multiple countries, and likely the ability to operate under at least two power systems. Trying two combine both in one locomotive will result in an unaffordable price.