Display:
Jerome a Paris:
the real, massive increases in CEO pay mainly happened in two phases: in the dotcom bullrun of the late 90s, and in the more recent Bush years.
Does anyone have historical data on the level of executive compensation?

A man of words and not of deeds is like a garden full of weeds; a man of deeds and not of words is like a garden full of turds — Anonymous
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 10:49:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There's this:

and this to show that most of the increase in incomes have come in the form of higher wages rather than in the form of capital gains:

Wage increases are associated with the managerial class, ofcourse.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 11:03:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In your last chart you can see that executive compensation increased starting around 1980 and stalled with the S&L crisis and the recession of the early 1990's.

So it's not just about the dot-com starting in the 1990's as you claim.

A man of words and not of deeds is like a garden full of weeds; a man of deeds and not of words is like a garden full of turds — Anonymous

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 11:11:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Galbraith's industrial corporation needs to be independent from outside interference. Now suppose an unforeseen crisis leads to indebtedness beyond the level that can be sustained by the old business model. Suddenly many corporations have to convince their creditors that they can grow like a malign cancer or face insolvency. The CEO would then be the guy with the cancer plan who tries to ensure that the creditors get their pound of meat.

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 02:00:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I seem to recall being shocked when I heard that a Mr. Nobody-anyone-ever-heard-of bank president (I think that was his title?) at a No-big-deal bank in the late 1980s made over a million dollars in a year, and in that year, he was one of the top earning bank presidents.  I'll see if I can dig up that information.  It was so shocking, but it was the beginning of a trend as I remember it.

After that, the smash-and-grab was on, and the CEO class never looked back.

by jjellin on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 09:25:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
His name was Baldini, and he was the president of Comfed mortgage who was paid over $2 million in 1987.  Here is a link to an archived article which makes the point that his earnings were really something at that time:

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-8010445.html

and here is a link to some document related to the FDIC investigation a decade later which mentions his base pay and bonuses in 1987 adding up to over $2million.  I can't remember what eventually happened to Baldini, but he got into some trouble after the bank/mortgage company failed.  It was an 80s thing.

http://www.qui-tam.net/USga1121.htm

by jjellin on Fri Jun 26th, 2009 at 08:45:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My comment below (with sources linked) may be relevant:
http://www.eurotrib.com/comments/2009/6/24/17130/0955/77#77

In 1987, Jim Baldini, the president of Comfed mortgage made over 2 million dollars.   Less than $400,000 was salary; the rest was "bonus."  As I recall at the time, it was shocking to think that anyone could possibly "earn" that much money in one year.

by jjellin on Fri Jun 26th, 2009 at 08:59:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series