Display:
Reading the biblical injunction closely, it is utter nonsense. None of the statements are logically justified.

It's more likely Paul is reflecting pre-existing eastern Mediterranean mores.

A man of words and not of deeds is like a garden full of weeds; a man of deeds and not of words is like a garden full of turds — Anonymous

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 11:58:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course he is, and providing them with the trappings of the new religion. All three religions - judeo-christian-muslim - have maintained patrirchal traditions of the semitic peoples in this way. This is why, imo, the hijab/niqab/burqa controversy is not properly speaking to do with religion.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 12:02:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And that's the issue with the burka finally, its imposition is merely cultural, but is defended as if it is a religious requirement.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 01:47:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think it's what clouds the issue. The burqa is not an issue of freedom of religion, any more than excision, arranged marriages, and polygamy are. (Disclaimer: I'm not conflating these with the burqa).
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Jun 26th, 2009 at 02:07:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series