Display:
  1. Money

  2. Links to powerful people in the US right. My working theory is not that Libertas was a piece of US government agency astroturfing but was backed by the sort of people who back the US Republican party and all the satellite think tanks over there. Even tactically it looked very much like it.

  3. Money

Don't forget that Libertas was a different brand with different policies in each electoral area. The brand was incoherent.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 1st, 2009 at 01:30:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There does not have to have been a political vision. There is also the possibility that Libertas' "pan-European" efforts were really just PR - that they paid a couple of nutcases around Europe for associating themselves with the Libertas "brand" in order to be able to say "look at all this pan-European organising - we're not anti-Europe at all" to the Irish electorate. And then trusting that those parts of the Irish electorate they had a chance of winning over would not look too closely at what all those furriners with funny names were saying in their home countries...

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Jul 9th, 2009 at 02:50:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series