Display:
I note that the discourse of the first historian (also the first you quote) strikes me as full of right-wing apologetics memes. Looking up the author on Wikipedia, I found this:

Michael Burleigh - Wikipedia

Recently his books have become controversial and accused of showing a marked dislike for all things Islamic. In his Guardian review of Sacred Causes, on 28 October 2006, John Gray wrote: "Burleigh is at his most unbalanced when discussing Islam. Much of his analysis is presented in a graffiti-like style that makes the tabloids look effete and precious. A photograph of the World Trade Center in flames is captioned with the statement 'This act of mass murder announced the onset of unlimited Islamist aggression against western civilisation', and there is much demotic rant against multiculturalism and what Burleigh describes as 'the grim prospect of "Eurabia"'. In this atmosphere of feverish emotion, facts tend to get lost and longer historical perspectives forgotten. [...]"[1]

Michael Burleigh serves on the advisory board of the new conservative magazine Standpoint and is a regular contributor.



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Jun 9th, 2009 at 07:03:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I picked up on that in his piece - he writes columns for the Daily Mail!

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Jun 9th, 2009 at 08:10:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, Burleigh has gone of the deep end in recent years. He is, however, an excellent historian.
by MarekNYC on Thu Jun 11th, 2009 at 09:02:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It appears that he is an expert on Middle Age history -- but also wrote books on the Nazis. Which part of his work are you familiar with?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Jun 11th, 2009 at 01:42:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The stuff on the Nazis
by MarekNYC on Thu Jun 11th, 2009 at 04:15:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series