Display:
I rather appreciated that insight, specturm of socialisms. The common trait of these ideologies is ideological conformity to achieve state-prescribed agenda. At the "soft" pole, the corporate agenda is indeterminate, or fluid; at the "hard" pole, a totalitarian, or insoluable, comity.

social democracy, in its radical communist version or its soft version.

What I find paradoxical, more so than contradictory, is his reference to modern(ity). It could be read as a kind of atavistic endorsement of imperial appetites for "progress."

From the start, it was possible for them [Greens] to take up a modern discourse.

Or read as the "base case" which a Green political impulse dissembles.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Tue Jun 9th, 2009 at 11:36:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I didn't like his use of "modern" there. But I suppose he's just comparing to the paleo-discourse (or the lack of propositions) of most of the left.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jun 9th, 2009 at 04:06:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series