Display:
This is actually a good thing, it was done as a protective measure against the kind of people who passed prop 13, prop 187 and kept trying to get "school vouchers" aka "kill the public schools."

Anything essential is earmarked to prevent the insane political ideologues in Southern California from using the state budget as a social experiment any more than they already have.

This is why it is typically best to ignore the state when they whine yearly about "going broke" and "catastrophic cuts" because they're really only talking about a very small $% of the budget.

The real issue that is coming to head this year is of course the lack of revenue due to not collecting nearly enough taxes on property.  This is just the kind of catastrophe necessary to bring "prop 13" back into the discussion.

by paving on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:13:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Right on.

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jul 18th, 2009 at 04:39:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series