Display:
How can there NOT be a DIN standard for railroad curves??? I am amazed...
by asdf on Tue Jul 14th, 2009 at 11:22:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
DIN is German standard. France had different standards.

Another, relatively well-known difference between the two is cant deficiency in curves.

For the non-railway-educated: "cant" is the tilt of tracks in curves, e.g. how much the outer rail is higher than the inner one. Cant obviously reduces the centrifugal forces acting on travellers. If the track is not tilted enough for to eliminate centrifugal forces completely at maximum permitted speed, then we have a cant deficiency -- which is the normal case, because we also have to consider when a train goes slow or stops at a signal in a curve.

However, in France, cant deficiency is generally much lower than in almost all other countries. So much so that there is little practical benefit for tilting trains -- which is why we don't see them there.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Jul 15th, 2009 at 01:39:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Interesting. I've never heard it called "cant" here, only "superelevation" for railroads and "camber" for auto roads. Good summary at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cant_(road/rail), which claims that up to 11" (28 cm) of superelevation is used in Europe!
by asdf on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 08:37:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Upon checking, that 11.8" = 300 mm is unbalanced superelevation (i.e. the Euro term "cant deficiency"), and only for tilting trains. That is, how much more elevation would be needed for no side accelerations at maximum speed.

For cant = superelevation itself, in Europe, the general limit is the same as in the US, 160 mm. It can be higher in France, and higher for slab track elsewhere. I thought it is significantly higher, but upon checking:

  • Slab track on German high-speed lines: max. cant 170 mm (see in this picture)

  • French high-speed lines: max. cant 180 mm.


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:49:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by asdf on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 12:41:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good article, thanks.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:04:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series