Display:
There's considerable skepticism out there as to whether the U.S. space program counts as basic science. Robots could do most of this stuff as well or better than humans, and the cost is a tiny fraction...

And don't even mention the manned Mars space program!

by asdf on Sun Jul 19th, 2009 at 09:23:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
For scientific research about the composition and nature of the solar system, than yes, robots are unquestionably better and cheaper.

It's harder to imagine plans to actually use anything we find out there without some manned component, barring a dramatic improvement in artificial intelligence.  Even if it's just a handful of people at some intermediate point, we're still sufficiently smarter than any machine in existence that any sort of large scale operation would likely benefit from having some people closer than 40 minutes or an hour away, via radio.

Besides, we can't start living in space or on other planets without practicing, and we don't do that with robots.

Many don't consider these even vaguely realistic goals, and maybe they aren't.  Many don't think them even particularly desirable, and maybe they aren't. Oh well.

by Zwackus on Mon Jul 20th, 2009 at 08:19:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series