Display:
If you think Blair will be both strong and effective, and you really want a weak presidency, then I find that a compelling reason to oppose him.

Blair wouldn't try to be strong and effective. He'd try to be strong, he'd be a disaster, and he'd totally discredit the institution. But just his mere appointment would be a PR mistake for the EU as a whole.

Just look at what he's done as Quartet Envoy to the Middle East.

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 at 02:01:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Migeru:
Blair wouldn't try to be strong and effective


The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 at 03:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed: while the President of the European Council was created in no small part to be living PR for the European Council, Bliar would not only fail to achieve this goal, but he would be a PR mistake for the EU as a whole.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 at 05:14:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I can buy that argument.
by santiago on Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 at 03:28:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series