It is well known that Churchill was obsessed (not without reasons...) by the advance of Soviet armies in central and eastern Europe and that some people (like Patton) wanted to fight the USSR and that some Nazi leaders tried to reverse alliances. But the US government opposed such projects and, as far as I know, they were never seriously considered.
Furthermore, this article makes many claims (i.e. alleged secret meetings between Stewart Menzies and Canaris) without quoting any source other than Novosti...
"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
Arriving at a conclusion of any sort can only be made after having consulted many sources and having distilled the most plausible account one can. The political nature of historical literature, will always contain an element of conjecture.
Hence, for my part, I don't reject websites based on supposed ill reputation.
Right. So, what about this:
But the US government opposed such projects and, as far as I know, they were never seriously considered.
Guido Preparata has provided a considerable body of information in his book, 'Conjuring Hitler', full of references with regard to the financial machinations behind both world wars.
I don't take Preparata's word as gospel, any more than I do Rozoff's research, but there are distinct rapprochements between the two.
In any event, both are worthy of consideration. .
