Display:
Who read the book? WHat do you think of it?

I haven't read the book, but finished watching the ten-part Russian TV series (2005). I can understand why both the Church and the Party hated this work: the Satan himself descends on Moscow, raises hell, especially in the circles of the literary establishment; and rewards the lover of an indexed writer who wrote a book on Pontius Pilate in the end; while the NKVD tries to prove that the band of devils was just a hypnotist.

Ethical message? I'm not sure -- and it seemed a bit reactionary.

THe TV series? It was big-budget, with lots of CGI; and at times out to draw the masses with the basest attractions (lots of spilling blood and bared breasts); but, at the same time, a great many good actors with remarkable faces: Kirill Lavrov as Pontius Pilate, Oleg Basilashvili as Woland/Satan, Aleksandr Abdulov as Koroviev... and so on. There was one major problem, though: the love between Master and Margarita just wasn't convincing.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Jul 7th, 2009 at 01:23:54 PM EST
It's one of the best novels I've read (and I have read a few (and afew's)

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Tue Jul 7th, 2009 at 01:44:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I second that. It's great. But the TV series was just too damn slow, 20 hours or something.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Jul 7th, 2009 at 01:48:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I read it.  I have to admit that a lot of the religious stuff was a bit lost on me.  This is probably one of those books you need a whole class devoted to in order to fully appreciate.  Still - it's brilliant, both for the social satire/critique, but also for the sheer entertainment factor.  Woland's gang is a hoot.

While it is explicitly meant to address the Soviet system, it has staying power.  I've never read a more spot on depiction of the Moscow I knew.  That's not a very politically correct thing to say, but it's true.

Not sure how I feel about CGI ... though how would you ever do it without CGI?

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.

by poemless on Tue Jul 7th, 2009 at 01:50:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A while back I wrote something about a huge balck cat who had mysteriously taken up residence at the Bulgakov Museum & no one here knew what I was talking about.

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by poemless on Tue Jul 7th, 2009 at 01:54:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry I didn't catch your remark. I actually have read the book...
by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Tue Jul 7th, 2009 at 05:16:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The CGI wasn't bad, it wasn't too obvious until the setting of the Walpurgis Night ball -- but Behemoth was done without. (A dwarf actor.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Jul 7th, 2009 at 02:04:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series