Display:
Once an empire, Britain faces big military cuts
Afghanistan operations in the future could be affected.
By Ben Quinn, The Christian Science Monitor

The global recession is causing Britain to face hard choices about its future military role in the world - putting at risk plans to build new aircraft carriers and heralding consequences for everything from operations alongside the US in Afghanistan to whether the UK remains nuclear-armed.

The start of the first full-scale official review of Britain's defense forces in more than 10 years was announced on Tuesday. It came within days of three of Britain's most influential independent research institutes forecasting that the £34 billion (about $54 billion) defense budget will be seriously cut.

The question of whether to support a £76 billion ($124 billion) program to replace Britain's aging Trident nuclear weapons system also looms large.

The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), warned that the UK cannot afford much of the defense equipment it plans to buy, questioned the value of renewing the submarine-launched Trident nuclear deterrent, and said it was "delusional" to think the UK could act alone without closer European defense cooperation.

The squeeze is likely also to have implications for Afghanistan. Prime Minister Gordon Brown has refused to send substantial reinforcements despite appeals from President Barack Obama for more assistance from NATO allies.

by Magnifico on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 04:05:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sadly, our entire political establishment is delusional and so there will be no change. Neither the tories nort  labour can even bring themselves to acknowledge that Trident is a waste of money based on lies.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 08:05:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series