Display:
...the European Atlanticists believe Europe needs protection, now.

I once added up the EU troop numbers and compared with the russian. It appears it was at the since deleted Boom! Headshot! diary and googlecache seams to have moved on, but anyway my point was that in number of soldiers EU and Russia is quite equally matched.

An EU with a one-for-all clause should be able to make any conventional invasion an even match or at least uneconomical, especially if NATOs common command is replaced with one for the EU. The french nukes should be enough to deter from nuclear attack.

So I do not understand what we would be needing protection from. The US?

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Wed Jul 8th, 2009 at 06:04:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Serious shooting wars have been uneconomical since shortly after the invention of breech-loading for rifles and artillery. The last serious land war that any of the belligerents actually can be said to have won is the Franco-Prussian war in 1869.

Every major war since then has had no winner, except the ones who stayed out of it and thus didn't get their work force and industrial plant depleted by it.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Jul 8th, 2009 at 06:31:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series