Display:
It's not either/or. A lot of computing and communications projects started with DARPA funding, so in a very literal way military research created the entire US computer industry.

People like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs packaged the research for popular consumption, but there would have been no Apple and no Microsoft without Whirlwind and SAGE.

At the same time vast amounts of military spending are pure pork - either spent corruptly, spent on projects that are plainly silly (like a 50s attempt to create a nuclear powered bomber), or militarily and diplomatically questionable, like missile defence.

The US could probably afford to cut military spending by 50 or 75% without losing any real military effectiveness.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 06:35:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Quite true, indeed.  But you also have to look at it the other way -- is it ever possible to achieve large military budgets without providing enough pork to gain domestic support.  At least since the Roman Republic, empires and international endeavors of any kind have always required some level of bribery to secure enough votes for such absurd and counter-intuitive adventures in the Senate.
by santiago on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 06:47:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series