Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
santiago:
You can't really compare the value of non-market activities with market activities because each valuation system is mutually exclusive but internally consistent, and that means that you can't really compare Chinese GDP with European, American, or Japanese GDP because the latter countries are no longer in the process of massive rural to urban reorganization that China is now experiencing. You can try to compare actual, physical movements of things such as oil, fertilizer, and raw materials, and the evidence is that China is indeed growing rapidly and probably unsustainably in its use of such things.
Real GDP is incomparable both across time and across countries because it is path-dependent. And nominal GDP is nearly meaningless because of inflation.

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Aug 12th, 2009 at 04:13:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

JakeS 4

Display:

Occasional Series