Display:
is a tricky concept. Most people have Manhattan in mind, but Paris actually packs more people, business and activity on its territory, per square kilometer, than Manhattan, despite having very few buildings above 6 floors.

There's still a lot of truck grdening in the first ring of suburbs (which is almost as dense as central Paris), but I'm not sure this is really required. The logistics (food and other good supply) of a dense big city with lots of local smallish supermarkets and retailers are actually the most efficient you can have - remember that the hardest bit is always the wholesale-to-retail bit; with local supermarkets that can be supplied by medium sized trucks and that people can walk to, you solve the biggest issue.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Aug 16th, 2009 at 12:20:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... against the idea that everyone must move into densely populated cities as an argument that nobody must move into densely populated cities.

The less energy intensive system for providing the produce that is sold in city groceries that preceded the current oil-fed agricultural system involved a range of cities, towns, and hamlets ... and one thing that you found in the hamlets that had efficient transport access to cities and towns was a ring of truck gardening.

Europe also lives beyond its biocapacity ... indeed, in the rough estimates of the Global Footprint Network, the US, Germany and Japan each live beyond our biocapacity by similar acreages. France roughly breaks even on its biocapacity, but unless nations like the US and France with above-average biocapacity per capita are able to live within our means, that is not a technological regime that is a candidate for global sustainability.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sun Aug 16th, 2009 at 01:50:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
only that big cities are sustainable even if they produce no food locally because it is not that resource intensive to supply them effectively, and they have lots of other advantages coming from their density.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 05:53:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... of the resource intensity to supply them is that its very resource intensive ... but the resources are further up the supply chain.

However, the point of my previous comment is that my comment before that was not saying that big cities would necessarily be unsustainable.

However, that food does have to come from somewhere, and we can not just wave a magic wand and exempt agriculture from the need to be sustainable, so that we can just feed the cities with massive factory farms employing some minute share of the population.

The most energy efficient source of fresh produce for the cities on a whole life cycle analysis will be truck gardens with very little trucking involved, shipped in from surrounding ex-suburbs along the same transport corridors that provide the energy efficient passenger transport.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 11:09:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Manhattan (27,490 / km2) has a higher population density than Paris (25,460 / km2).

The point that you don't need high-rises for density still stands, of course.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 06:02:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for the exact number. I'm still trying to dig up GDP numbers to compare as well...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 06:11:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
New York Gross Metropolitan Product: $1.2tn.

Paris Region GDP: $731bn.

I'm a bit surprised by how low London in.  Only about $669bn.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 06:58:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
but that's not the numbers I'm looking for - just Paris (the inside-the-ring city) vs Manhattan.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 07:00:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Right, I posted another comment below my original.  I don't think we calculate output for Manhattan alone, since it's only one borough of the city.  You could probably find Paris somewhere, but I couldn't get ahold of it.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 07:05:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
...adding: Those are obviously not comparisons between Paris and Manhattan but rather the two metro areas.  I don't see actual statistics for either the Paris city limits or Manhattan.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 07:03:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, administratively, Manhattan = New York County and Paris = the 75 département (and the city), so it should be easy to find data for both deep down the bowels of our respective statistical administrations...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 04:46:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series