Display:
only that big cities are sustainable even if they produce no food locally because it is not that resource intensive to supply them effectively, and they have lots of other advantages coming from their density.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 05:53:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... of the resource intensity to supply them is that its very resource intensive ... but the resources are further up the supply chain.

However, the point of my previous comment is that my comment before that was not saying that big cities would necessarily be unsustainable.

However, that food does have to come from somewhere, and we can not just wave a magic wand and exempt agriculture from the need to be sustainable, so that we can just feed the cities with massive factory farms employing some minute share of the population.

The most energy efficient source of fresh produce for the cities on a whole life cycle analysis will be truck gardens with very little trucking involved, shipped in from surrounding ex-suburbs along the same transport corridors that provide the energy efficient passenger transport.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Aug 17th, 2009 at 11:09:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series