Display:
I agree, I find he hypocrisy about this to be disturbing. It seems that rape doesn't matter as much as artistic talent. Like those people who forgive all the raping fashionistas.

The fact that the victim says she wants him freed is irrelevant. After all, she has been outed as a rape victim, no anonimity for her. Everytime it's been in the news she's had her humiliation rubbed in her face. She wants it to be over. I imagine she wants it gone from her life, she wants to be who she is, not Roman Polanski's victim. and nobody will let that happen.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Sep 28th, 2009 at 05:19:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree and I have been wondering if there would have been such an outcry by artist and politicians if he had not been famous.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Sep 28th, 2009 at 05:24:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There are horrible, horrible rumours circulating about systemic rape and child abuse in show biz and politics.

It would be easy to file them under conspiracy-theory paranoia if it weren't for the way that the stories and reports keep surfacing, and the apparently inconsistent standards that apply to famous people.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Sep 28th, 2009 at 08:00:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Systematic rape and child abuse" is the common lot of all mankind. And in most cases it is a question of parents, step-parents, relatives, or family friends.
by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Tue Sep 29th, 2009 at 05:43:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Quite right.

This whole campaign against Polanski must have something else behind it.

Why would he be singled out when, during the 1960s-80s Los Angeles 'free love' movement, any number of prominent movie and music stars - Jack Nicholson, Warren Beatty, Denis Hopper, Jim Morrison, to name only a few - were engaged in luxury home, pool-side, drugged out orgies? Virtually all of this took place in notorious Laurel Canyon where, for several decades, underage girls were consumed like hors d'oeuvres.  

How many parents are on record as having objected?

This is not to condone Polanski's act, by any means, but the LA police department might have done better to do a thorough investigation of the murder of Polanski's pregnant wife, which was studiously thwarted, than to have pursued Polanski for what was known to authorities to be common Laurel Canyon practice.

One might wonder even whether Polanski knows a thing or two about the Laurel Valley drug / sex / murder racket that authorities would prefer to ensure were kept under wraps.    
.

by Loefing on Tue Sep 29th, 2009 at 03:56:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, Samantha settled out of court for an undisclosed amount under anonimity as Jane Doe in 1988. However, she was the one who revealed her own identity 20 years after the case in 1997. For twenty years her identity had been kept secret by all parties involved in the case.

I'm quite sure Samantha regrets the mistake of coming out in 1997 but her present notoriety is largely her own undoing. She relinquished her "right to be forgotten."

For a thorough treatment of the case I suggest reading Gerald Posner's Polanski's Next Escape and related articles linked on the dailybeast site.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Tue Sep 29th, 2009 at 05:38:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for the data.

In the end, this is not something that Hillary or Barry can touch. In addition to lock-stepping seniors into happy euthanasia camps, they can't take on a label of letting old geezers get away with raping teenagers.

This will run its course. The Superior Court in California will have to drop the case for lack of something, and that will be that. Unfortunately for Polanski, since he has run from sentencing before, he probably won't be allowed free on bond. So he will do some time until it all winds through the system...starting now, I presume.

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Tue Sep 29th, 2009 at 06:30:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
57 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
34 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
34 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
57 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series