Display:
Thanks.

Under the Lisbon Treaty, the job is to be a full-time one.

I'm to understand then, one of Blair's crucial qualifications is that he's currently unemployed and available to begin "work" immediately?

The Council President won't be democratially elected, it will be elected in the Council

This I understood. And if the honor is emeritus, an election created for Council pensioners by Council members, cultivating popular disapproval of Blair's candidacy is void. Unless some language in the treaty permits Council constituents to disqualify a candidate.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Fri Sep 25th, 2009 at 01:58:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm to understand then, one of Blair's crucial qualifications is that he's currently unemployed and available to begin "work" immediately?

Well he is employed, but bored of the job... as Middle East envoy. He is bored, but I would more say that that disqualifies him....

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Sep 25th, 2009 at 02:03:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My meaning was somewhat facetious :) as Blair is a "retired" prime minister, is he not? I would be reluctant to argue that his many "part-time" occupations entail few obligations other than the odd dinner theater engagement and salary collection.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Fri Sep 25th, 2009 at 03:51:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
However, there is indirect democratic effect. The Council isn't themost popular EU instittution... in fact it is the least popular one. So one reason many consented to ther permanent President idea was that such a President could give a higher profile to the Council, and a good pick could give a better image to this club of the powerful (who would continue to make their backroom deals behind our backs nevertheless).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Sep 25th, 2009 at 02:08:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hmmm. Taken together with the concern down-thread about Council president-elect undermining the EU president, wouldn't a campaign to "stop Blair" acquire greater potency if tied to a campaign to discredit the office itself? The long view suggests, this G8 privilege to disrupt member rotation of influence through EU presidency even as the union expands.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Fri Sep 25th, 2009 at 04:18:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The office itself doesn't need to be discredited, just kept down to size. Who holds the office for the first term will largely help define the post, and it is imperative that this first person be someone who is diplomatic, widely respected and has the proven ability to broker agreements among EU member states and the interest to engage in the boring bits of the job. Blair fails on all counts. He wants the job for self-aggrandizement, he would want to encroach on at least one of the other 4 top EU jobs (the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy), he is a divider and highly controversial, and he failed to mediate any important agreements among member states while the UK holds the rotating presidency.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Sep 26th, 2009 at 05:48:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series