Display:
Then, is a stockholder vote democratic?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Sep 26th, 2009 at 01:32:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suppose so.

What are the conditions for democracy? Is one-man-one-vote one of them? Is representative democracy democratic?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Sep 26th, 2009 at 01:36:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There is a fundamental difference here: In the Union, voting weights are determined by population (although in a slower than linear manner), in a stockholder meeting the voting weights are determined by monetary clout.

The analogy to the stockholder's meeting would be accurate if voting weights were determined by GDP. Or by GDP pro capita.

(That aside, the parallels between the modern Western, spin-mediated version of democracy and the stockholder's meeting are eerily accurate at times.)

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Sep 26th, 2009 at 02:43:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Two points.

First, is the IMF not democratic since votes are proportional to budgetary contributions?

What of Penrose's square-root rule and the power index? Why is "slower than linear with population" a bad thing?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Sep 26th, 2009 at 02:48:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
First, is the IMF not democratic since votes are proportional to budgetary contributions?

Yes, the IMF is not democratic. (The fact that votes are weighted according to budget contributions is probably the least of the democratic problems, but that's the IMF for you...)

What of Penrose's square-root rule and the power index? Why is "slower than linear with population" a bad thing?

I didn't mean to say that they were a bad thing. There are as many sound cases for having slower than linearly increasing voting weights as there are sound cases against it.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Sep 26th, 2009 at 04:01:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series