Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
It's not a "purely technocratic role", but it is not one, in the current state of the history of the European Council, of the views of different member states (large and small), and in the actual language of the Lisbon treaty, that admits of the big charismatic leader option (without risk of considerable problems to come).

As for your premiss "most people want to be ruled by people they can identify with and admire ("heroeise") and who make them feel proud to be part of something bigger than themselves", I am not sure that that is in fact the case in Europe today. And, even if it were, it's not just the EU that would be on the lookout for such rulers, is it?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Sep 27th, 2009 at 05:00:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think you are arguing the same case I am making in discussion with Jerome below.  The difference between overbearing ego and good communication skills can be fine, at times, and there are not many who come to mind who can manage that distinction.

notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sun Sep 27th, 2009 at 05:25:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series