Display:
Excellent diary, afew.

I personally dislike the compromise achieved over the European Council president. I think it would make a lot more sense to have permanent presidents of the 'nine configurations' of the Council of the European Union in the way that the Eurogroup has a permanent president.

But for these, the rotating presidency will be maintained. Well, except for the external relations council which will be chaired by the High Representative. I think it is likely that this is where the main competition will be. The European Council president and the rotating presidency will have to struggle over the privilege of agenda-setting. The upside is that a capable president of the Commission could use that conflict to his/her benefit.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Thu Oct 1st, 2009 at 05:34:40 AM EST
The upside is that a capable president of the Commission could use that conflict to his/her benefit.

Yeah, a capable Commission president would be nice. And while we're dreaming, I'd like a pony too.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Oct 1st, 2009 at 05:55:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And, is it not a pity Felipe González is all but retired?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Oct 1st, 2009 at 06:55:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If Lisbon passes I expect no major treaty changes for twenty years, so I'm looking beyond the current five-year horizon :-)

Then again, a big part of the 'roles' should be defined in the next five years, which is the downside, and which is all the more reason to Stop Blair.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Thu Oct 1st, 2009 at 07:16:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Would it not make more sense for these 9 configurations to be chaired by the relevant senior Commissioners acting as Commission vice Presidents?  And perhaps ultimately for the President of Commission and Council to be combined?

Its hard not to see the rotating Presidencies as a transitional feature which may come to be seen as a bug - as in the case of the Council itself.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Thu Oct 1st, 2009 at 12:29:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's an institutional problem there, in that the Commission proposes legislation that is approved (or not) by Council (and here this is not the European Council). Having the 9 configurations chaired by the Commissioners responsible for legislative projects is not exactly a recipe for clarity.

I don't know, on the other hand, what to think of the proposal of uniting the functions of Commission President and European Council president. Except that there is probably something of the above objection to be expected.

On the rotating presidency: the small countries don't want to lose it entirely, and the fact that it remains in the Lisbon treaty is probably a concession that helped calm their revolt. (I say probably, no historical certainty on that!)

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Oct 1st, 2009 at 02:33:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Jon Worth once had a campaign - called whodoicall.eu - proposing the European Council Presidency and the Commission Presideny to be merged. I had a short exchange with him back then, and I have the same opinion now:
The Council and the Commission are very different bodies (the first intergovernmental, and mainly legislative, the second supranational and mainly executive). I don't think that they should have one head, as the roles are very different.

I'm also not happy about the new single Council presidency and hope that the position will not become one of great power.

An appointed Council President is appropriate insofar as the body is intergovernmental -- of the Member States.


Interestingly, Kissinger himself can't recall ever having said the "who do I call" line.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Fri Oct 2nd, 2009 at 06:21:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Brilliant! Kissinger's call:

FT.com | Gideon Rachman's Blog | Kissinger never wanted to dial Europe

The Kissinger "who do I call" remark was trotted out at almost every seminar I ever went to Brussels. So I'm delighted to add it to the list of "famous sayings that were never said".

Reginald Dale of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington (and before that of The Financial Times) has written to me to say: "Kissinger never made the famous remark about Europe's telephone number. According to the late Peter Rodman, who knew him well, the saying is apocryphal, and in fact Kissinger's concern was the precise opposite - he was fed up with having to deal with a Dane whom he regarded as incompetent and ineffective, who was trying to represent the whole of the EU as President of the Council. Kissinger himself has disowned the remark, and it seems that he was actually seeking to divide and rule in Europe, rather than be restricted to a single voice on the telephone."

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Oct 2nd, 2009 at 07:30:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series