The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Market crisis 'will happen again' "The crisis will happen again but it will be different," he told BBC Two's The Love of Money series. He added that he had predicted the crash would come as a reaction to a long period of prosperity. But while it may take time and be a difficult process, the global economy would eventually "get through it", Mr Greenspan added. "They [financial crises] are all different, but they have one fundamental source," he said. "That is the unquenchable capability of human beings when confronted with long periods of prosperity to presume that it will continue." (...) Mr Greenspan, who when he ran the US central bank was hailed as a man who could move markets, also warned that the world's financial institutions should have seen the looming crisis. "The bankers knew that they were involved in an under-pricing of risk and that at some point a correction would be made," he said. (...) In order to prevent the situation arising again financiers and governments should look to clamp down on fraud and increase capital requirements for banks, the former central banker said. (...) "The most recent endeavour to re-regulate is a reaction to the crisis. The extraordinary impact of these global markets is making a lot of financial people feeling they have lost control. "The problem is you cannot have free global trade with highly restrictive, regulated domestic markets."
"The crisis will happen again but it will be different," he told BBC Two's The Love of Money series.
He added that he had predicted the crash would come as a reaction to a long period of prosperity.
But while it may take time and be a difficult process, the global economy would eventually "get through it", Mr Greenspan added.
"They [financial crises] are all different, but they have one fundamental source," he said.
"That is the unquenchable capability of human beings when confronted with long periods of prosperity to presume that it will continue."
(...)
Mr Greenspan, who when he ran the US central bank was hailed as a man who could move markets, also warned that the world's financial institutions should have seen the looming crisis.
"The bankers knew that they were involved in an under-pricing of risk and that at some point a correction would be made," he said.
In order to prevent the situation arising again financiers and governments should look to clamp down on fraud and increase capital requirements for banks, the former central banker said.
"The most recent endeavour to re-regulate is a reaction to the crisis. The extraordinary impact of these global markets is making a lot of financial people feeling they have lost control.
"The problem is you cannot have free global trade with highly restrictive, regulated domestic markets."
So:
Why is this man taken seriously, again, and not as the religious nutcase he is? In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
Why is this man taken seriously, again, and not as the religious nutcase he is?
Simon Johnson is dead on about the need to bring the financial system to heel. Unfortunately, the prospects seem dim at best. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Nope. Two.
The deficit basis of money created as debt.
Profit maximisation. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
Why? Simple. Because that system does not necessarily lead to an ever-escalating debt cycle. The reason for this is in law.
Consider: The central bank decides to emit 500.000 units of currency. Let's assume, for simplicity of example, that it gives money to the state in exchange for a bond with which the state is obligated to return 550.000 in ten years' time.
However, after 10 years the central bank decides not to demand that the debt be paid, since there is no reason to tighten the money supply. After a certain time from the day the debt comes due, depending upon the legal system, the creditor cannot demand that the debtor pay. That "debt" will be purely nominal, since, if the central bank were to demand that the state pay, the state could claim the obligation has expired.
The rest I agree with. Bretton-Woods is proof that the world can agree on lower economic growth due to the curbing of the worst parts of human nature in exchange for stability. Iuris praecepta sunt haec: Honeste vivere, alterum non laedere, suum cuique tribuere. - Ulpian, Digestae
Floating currencies aren't all that they're jacked up to be, unless you're a hot money speculator.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
by DoDo - May 20 35 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2035 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments