Display:
The overall failure of the drive for wind cannot be blamed on Fogh, much as I would like to - The energy plans of every party actually elected to the folkting are publically available, and noone in spitting distance of the levers of power advocate a mix, or for that matter, a level of investment, that would actually allow us to dynamite the coal plants.

(I watched bits of connie hedegårds confirmation hearing this morning. Depressing as fuck, as she was standing by the danish consensus on energy policy, and it is a consensus that has failed to deliver)

by Thomas on Fri Jan 15th, 2010 at 08:54:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
For suitable definition of "spitting distance."

SF has a coal phaseout policy.

Now, if you subscribe to the theory that SF is firmly installed in S' back pocket, that doesn't matter. But if you subscribe to that theory, you really rather need to take a look at the last EP and municipal elections...

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Jan 15th, 2010 at 10:03:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The overall failure of the drive for wind cannot be blamed on Fogh, much as I would like to - The energy plans of every party actually elected to the folkting are publically available

Don't mix past and present. I don't know what the parties current plans are, but the overall failure over the past decade can be blamed 100% on Fogh. The previous SocDem plan was all-out.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Jan 15th, 2010 at 03:18:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series