Display:
.
Balkenende is the sole member of this Cabinet who was involved in the decision to give poltical support for the U.S. and British attack on Iraq in March 2003. A few hours after receiving the Iraq Report from the Committee chairman Davids, Balkenende made his position as Prime Minister impossible by criticising the conclusions. After a very long delay to start a review and investigation of the Dutch participation in the planning and preparation of the Iraq War, PM Balkenende refused an investigation by Parliament.

Under great pressure, he himself appointed this Iraq commission to provide an impartial review. It is not wise to take this path of attack, the commission has performed an excellent task and gives support to the many objections vented throughout the years. The present coalition partner, the Labour Party (PvdA), was in the opposition in the fall of 2002 and opposed the War. In Februari 2003 they joined a new Cabinet under leadership of Balkenende and made a compromise to offer only political support, based on knowledge released by the previous administration with Jaap de Hoop Schepper as Minister of Foreign Affairs.

With Balkenende's line of attack yesterday, the Labour Party became furious and went into the opposition. Would the PvdA members in Parliament join the opposition parties in any major vote, then Balkenende and his Cabinet will fall.

Balkenende should have accepted some responsibility, he refused to acknowledge making any mistakes or misjudgements. Must have to impressed by George Bush.

Damage control, do's and don'ts

"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."

by Oui on Wed Jan 13th, 2010 at 04:49:27 AM EST
Balkenende is playing by neocon rules -

  1. There is no problem
  2. If there is a problem, we did the right thing
  3. If we didn't do the right thing - which we did, because there's no problem - someone else is to blame, and we're just innocent bystanders.
  4. I have complete confidence in my own majesty, which you can share by believing all of the above.
  5. See 1.

What happens now is a battle of narratives within the PvdA, depending on whether or not they're principled enough to sacrifice power for political integrity - and also whether or not political integrity can be transformed into more power.
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jan 13th, 2010 at 05:02:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Dutch PM clings on as inquiry finds invasion had no mandate - Times Online

Mr Balkenende rejected calls to resign last night and said that he disagreed with the commission. "The Cabinet's view has always been that a new Security Council resolution [authorising the invasion] was desirable but not necessary," he said...

Allard de Rooi, of Transparency about Iraq, said: "I cannot imagine a world in which the Prime Minister of a Western country just ignores the verdict of senior judges in a inquiry which he ordered.

"He has got to resign. He is saying that there are two kinds of law -- one for him and one for the rest of the world."



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jan 13th, 2010 at 05:22:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Labour clashes with PM over Davids report | Radio Netherlands Worldwide
The Labour Party, a member of Mr Balkenende's tri-party coalition, says the Davids report is "disturbing" and that Mr Balkenende's response is not on behalf of the Labour Party.
 
Mariëtta Hamer, leader of Labour's parliamentary party, says she was "unpleasantly surprised" by Mr Balkenende's response to the report. Labour has called on Mr Balkenende to emphasise the difference between the 2003 cabinet - the party was in opposition at the time - and the current one. The party has called for another response to the criticisms in the Davids report this week.


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jan 13th, 2010 at 05:24:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the Labour Party became furious and went into the opposition

I can't find evidence of this. Handelsblad reported an hour ago that Bos and Rouvoet are meeting Balkenende right now.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Jan 13th, 2010 at 05:35:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the article you link to, Rouvoet, leader of the third coalition partner, comes out and says that Balkenende's statement was reconciled before release with six other cabinet member, including minister Bos (who is both minister of Finances, and PvdA party-leader).

But the PvdA as party has protested.

Either Bos silences the dissent in his own party, or he is faithful to the party-line and upsets the coalition. So far Bos is staunchly carrying through as member of the cabinet and keeps a stiff upper lip.

I note that Mariette Hamer, who leads the PvdA in Parliament, and Wouter Bos have a cordial relationship. If this is a pre-conceived stratagem by Bos and Hamer (which I think rather unlikely), it's a game of high stakes - I doubt whether the PvdA is actually capable of that.

Rouvoet is ass-covering Balkenende - no surprises there.

by Nomad on Wed Jan 13th, 2010 at 06:11:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series